Pharrell Williams not ‘Happy,’ threatens to sue Trump for using song after mass killing

Pharrell Williams not ‘Happy,’ threatens to sue Trump for using song after mass killing

play Show Caption Hide Caption Pharrell Williams and wife Helen Lasichanh welcome triplets

Pharrell Williams has three newfangled reasons to be “ happy ” time Pharrell Williams is not “ felicitous ” that President Donald Trump used his song. The singer, 45, sent a cease-and-desist letter to Trump after the president played Williams ‘ 2014 bankrupt hit “ felicitous ” at a political event in the Midwest Saturday, barely hours after closely a twelve people were gunned down in a Pittsburgh synagogue. “ On the day of the mass murder of 11 human beings at the hands of a crazed ‘ nationalist, ’ you played his song ‘ Happy ’ to a crowd at a political consequence in Indiana, ” Williams ‘ lawyer, Howard King, wrote in the letter obtained by USA TODAY. Williams ‘ legal team noted that the use of the birdcall was not only ill timed, but in violation of “ copyright violation ” and “ brand rights. ” Related: Chris Evans slams Trump in mocking tweet : ‘No one has ever been treated then unfairly. ‘ More:  Kanye West designs ‘Blexit ‘ dress to urge black voters to leave the Democratic party “ There was nothing ‘ felicitous ’ about the tragedy inflicted upon our area on Saturday and no permission was granted for your use of this song for this function, ” the letter read.

The letter made it clear that Williams “ will not ” allow Trump to use any of his melodious catalog in the future : “ demand is hereby made that you cease and desist from any further unauthorized use of Pharrell Williams ‘ music. ” This is not the first, or second, time Trump has caught flak for the birdcall choices at his political events. In August, Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler sent Trump a cease-and-desist letter after the air force officer in chief played the isthmus ‘s hit song “ Livin ’ on the Edge ” at a tease in Charleston, West Virginia. “ Mr. Trump is creating the false stamp that our node has given his consent for the use of his music, and even that he endorses the presidency of Mr. Trump, ” Tyler ’ s legal team said in a letter obtained by USA TODAY. R.E.M., Prince ‘s estate and Queen are among the other artists who have objected to the president of the united states ‘s use of their music. Nor is Trump the alone politician to have been turned down by musicians with catchy songs. Bruce Springsteen ‘s “ Born in the U.S.A. ” was co-opted by politicians like President Ronald Reagan and erstwhile GOP presidential campaigner Bob Dole after it came out in 1984, forcing Springsteen to push back. But it ‘s not so slowly anymore to get away with it, says entertainment lawyer Zachary Elsea. For one thing, the internet and social media have increased the chances artists will find out that their music is being used without their license. “ Second, many artists have demonstrated that they are willing to sue politicians who use their cultivate without asking, ” says Elsea, whose California firm represented Jackson Browne ’ s successful lawsuit against John McCain ’ s political campaign in 2008 for using a trot from “ Running on Empty ” in an ad mocking Barack Obama ‘s positions on flatulence conservation.

“ If an artist drops the count after sending a cease-and-desist letter, then it remains easier to ask forgiveness than permission by just never using that artist ’ s work again, ” Elsea says. “ But these campaigns always run the hazard of sparking expensive and drawn-out litigation if the artist is motivated to sue. ”  Related: Steven Tyler is seeing crimson after Trump played Aerosmith songs at rallies, again

generator :
Category : music

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© Copyright 2020 KUBET - KU CASINO. KUBET.IO - Nhà cái hàng đầu châu Á.